Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry


Mandelson to prioritise university science funding

Posted by The Independent
  • Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 11:27 am
Author: By Alison Kershaw, Press Association

Lord Mandelson is due to publish a new blueprint on the future of the UK's universities which will set out the priorities for the sector and comes before a review of the student funding system is due to begin.

He is expected to say that universities will play a major role in helping the country's economic recovery in the future.

The framework will examine the issues facing universities at a time when funding is becoming tighter. This is expected to include looking at "a greater concentration of high level research, particularly in high-cost science areas".

And it is likely to set out how the Government will work with universities to strengthen the economy.

The framework is also widely expected to say that students should be treated like "consumers" and given more information about courses, including information on contact hours and drop-out rates and future earnings.

Speaking at a CBI Higher Education summit in London two weeks ago, Lord Mandelson said students should be "pickier" about their university choices, saying they should be more demanding to boost quality in higher education.

At the same conference he warned that if students are expected to pay more for higher education they are entitled to receive more from the system.

The comments fuelled speculation that the Government will consider raising the £3,225 cap on tuition fees.

He said: "It's a change in culture and attitude that we want to encourage.

"As students who go into higher education pay more, they will expect more and are entitled to receive more in terms not just of the range of courses but in the quality of experience they receive during their time in the higher education system."

He said Government and industry will need to be more demanding and to monitor and scrutinise more on behalf of students.

At the same conference Lord Mandelson suggested that universities, courses or even lecturers which fail to live up to students' expectations will be scrapped.

As well as focusing on offering students value for money, the new framework is likely to outline ways of widening participation at universities and to call for greater collaboration between universities and businesses.

University leaders have called for more funding and a report by vice-chancellors' umbrella group Universities UK published earlier this year suggested fees could be raised to £5,000 without affecting student numbers.

But such a move to introduce higher fees is likely to be highly unpopular with the public.

Lord Mandelson told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme that students should be given details of how employable courses would make them, including the earnings of alumni.

"It is very important that universities must give much fuller information about the type and quality of teaching, how much direct contact with teachers in the universities they will have," the peer said.

"But also, for example, how much international experience they will have where this is relevant to their course."

He defended tuition fees as a "bold and successful" move by the Labour Government, but confirmed that a review of the charges would take nine to 12 months - meaning it will not be complete before the General Election.


View full article here

Comments

Misunderstanding problems with science
[info]iaintom wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 11:27 am (UTC)
It's all very well to say that funding should be directed at big cost science projects, but the raising of tuition fees and the move towards students as consumers threatens to undermine the eduction of young scientists. Science is not, and has never been a discipline which pays off financially. The best young science students choose science out of a passion for the pursuit of knowledge and understanding, knowing fully well that the financial rewards will be modest compared to many other career choices. By raising tuition fees, the government by its own admission expects students to shop around for the degrees that will give them the best financial return on their investment. The outcome is likely to be ever increasing numbers of the brightest young minds been drawn away from science towards other more financially lucrative careers. Why saddle yourself with student debt and put yourself through 7-8 years of extremely difficult, demanding education followed by 3 years or more as a postdoc only to see yourself in a career that pays less than half (sometimes a lot less than half) of what you'd be earning as a doctor or working in finance? The fact that both this government and the opposition seem to regard rigorous scientific evidence as little more than personal opinion and scientific experts as conveniently dismissed won't help to attract future scientists to the field either.

The move towards students as high-paying consumers will also pressure science departments to make their courses more superficially attractive by lowering standards and in particular moving from a model that requires students to inquire, question and be challenged, to one in which they are given the necessary facts to pass exams on a plate.

A good science education is difficult, involving many years of extremely challenging and self-motivated study with little financial pay off. Increasing fees can only have two effects: the loss of future scientists and the dumming down of science courses to attract students in the face of dwindling enrollments. The impact on British society might not be immediate, but the long term social and economic consequences of a diminished science sector are likely to be significant.
Social enginnering of the worst kind
[info]red_planet92 wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 08:14 pm (UTC)
Under a Labour government low exam scores 'should be no bar to top universities'. Employers keep this in mind. British universities are relying heavily on a reputation they earned decades ago. Social enginnering of the worst kind.


education
[info]uk77 wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 11:59 pm (UTC)
Thought is too complex
Who wants "dumbed down" professionals?
[info]red_planet92 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 04:30 pm (UTC)
If I go to a doctor (accountant, lawyer, engineer, teacher etc) I'm not sure I'd like them to have had low exam scores, but been let in because they had a "difficult upbringing".
Mediocrity...
[info]annlewis wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 05:36 pm (UTC)
rules OK