Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry


Yard rules out inquiry as hacking row simmers on

Posted by The Independent
  • Thursday, 9 July 2009 at 11:59 pm
Author: By Michael Savage, Political Correspondent

The Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner John Yates came to the conclusion after reviewing the case yesterday. That followed claims that the former deputy prime minister John Prescott was among the victims of a hacking operation which resulted in the jailing of Clive Goodman, former royal editor of the News of the World, and private investigator Glenn Mulcaire in 2007, for unlawfully intercepting communications in an effort to find out information about Prince William.

After being told by The Guardian that he had also been a target, Mr Prescott called for the sacking of Andy Coulson, the director of communications for the Conservative Party and a former editor of the News of the World who resigned at the time of Goodman's conviction.

A procession of senior Labour figures attempted to heap pressure on David Cameron and his aide Mr Coulson, sniffing revenge for the damage inflicted on the Government by the departure of its disgraced spin doctor Damian McBride.

Gordon Brown took time out from the G8 summit in Italy to say that the phone-bugging allegations raised "questions that are serious and will obviously have to be answered". Lord Mandelson said the public needed "a proper explanation of what went on, how it was financed, who was involved, and who authorised it", while Alastair Campbell questioned Mr Coulson's position. Tom Watson, the former Cabinet Office minister who was close to Mr McBride before his departure, also chipped in.

But Mr Yates declared last night there was no evidence that Mr Prescott's phone had been tapped. The Crown Prosecution Service does plan an "urgent" review of the evidence on phone-hacking.

In spite of the police statement, News Group still faces the possibility of paying millions in damages to victims of phone-hacking. It was claimed that Gordon Taylor, the chief executive of the Professional Footballers' Association,had been paid £700,000 in an out-of-court "gagging" settlement, after being a victim of the campaign. News Group refused to comment on the allegation.

The Guardian also alleged that News Group settled claims with two other victims, paying out £300,000, and that "two or three thousand" others, including the actors Jude Law and Gwyneth Paltrow and the chef Nigella Lawson, may have been targeted by private investigators hired by Mr Murdoch's journalists.

But Mr Yates said the police inquiry had been "solely concerned with phone tapping" and that detectives were only aware of this affecting "a much smaller pool of people".

Lawyers urge public figures worried that they have been targeted by the tapping to consider seeking damages. Nigel Tait, a media partner at Carter Ruck, said: "I would encourage those affected by the activities of the News of the World to ascertain what information is being held about them, how it was obtained, an order for destruction of the information, recordings etc ? and of course to seek compensation and an undertaking or injunction against the newspaper group to prevent this happening again."

Nick Armstrong, a media lawyer with the London law firm Charles Russell, pointed out: "The damages paid to Gordon Taylor were presumably civil damages for breach of privacy, the sum involved dwarfs the £60,000 previous record privacy damages to Max Mosley."

Mr Coulson has always claimed that he knew nothing of Goodman's unlawful methods, despite their wide use. Mr Cameron insisted yesterday that his press chief's job was safe.

The House of Commons select committee on culture, media and sport will on Tuesday reopen its inquiry, set up after the Goodman trial, into how journalists at the News of the World obtained their information. John Whittingdale, the Tory MP who chairs the committee, said Mr Coulson was "almost certain" to be called to give evidence.

In an embarrassing development for News Group, the former chairman of News International, Les Hinton, who is now chief executive of Dow Jones and one of Mr Murdoch's most senior executives, is set to be summoned. Mr Hinton assured MPs in 2007 that Goodman was acting independently of senior News of the World staff and that his methods were not used by any other journalists.

Rebekah Wade, a former editor of The Sun and the News of the World, will also be asked to provide evidence. Ms Wade was recently appointed chief executive of News International.

Mr Murdoch, who has placed his son James in charge of his British media operations, will be furious at the developments. He told Bloomberg News on Wednesday evening that he had no knowledge of the alleged payment to Mr Taylor, adding that "if that had happened I would know about it".

Among the victims of News of the World stories assessing their chances of winning damages was Mark Oaten, the Liberal Democrat MP whose relationship with a male prostitute was exposed by the newspaper in 2006. He said he would demand that the Met and the Information Commissioner ? whose office raided and successfully prosecuted a Hampshire private investigating firm ? hand over any details pertaining to him. "But I urge caution on widespread attacks on journalism over this issue as there may be some cases where it could be justified for good investigative journalism," he said.

Tessa Jowell, who was also named as among those who had allegedly had her phone tapped, is said to be concerned over the allegations. Vanessa Feltz and Max Clifford are among those already consulting their lawyers.

News International said: "It is inappropriate to comment at this time."

The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act creates a criminal offence of intentionally intercepting a communication in the course of its transmission on a public telecommunications system without lawful authority. The only defences are if proper authorisation has been given or there is a strong public interest in breaking the law to reveal a crime or serious wrongdoing.

Phone hacking: How the News of the World intercepted messages

When Clive Goodman decided to intercept voice messages left for the Royal Household he was less in the character of a Le Carré spy than a teenage technology geek. The News of the World's royal editor was able, with the help of private detective Glenn Mulcaire, to make phone calls from his home and office to listen to other people's messages.

Goodman and Mulcaire made 609 calls between them to the voicemails of Jamie Lowther-Pinkerton, the private secretary to Princes William and Harry, Helen Asprey, the personal secretary to the Prince of Wales, and Paddy Harverson, his communications chief.

Mulcaire also hacked into messages left for the publicist Max Clifford, the football agent Skylet Andrew, the chairman of the Professional Footballers Association Gordon Taylor, MP Simon Hughes and the model Elle Macpherson.

They were caught in 2006 after Prince William realised that information he'd told only a handful of people, notably details of a knee injury, were being made public. Members of the Royal Household also began to notice that messages on their phones they'd yet to listen to were showing up as having been heard.

Mobile telephone users can access voicemails without using their own handsets and with a little bit of knowhow it was easy for the pair to intercept the messages. When mobile users access messages remotely they type in a security code but often it is left as a default number. Mulcaire was also able to bluff telephone companies into changing PIN numbers.

It is possible for messages to be intercepted lawfully in some circumstances by government-approved officials but there was no public interest defence for the pair.

It is thought that Mr taylor must have sued under privacy rules to win his reported £700,000 settlement from News Group, as would the two other claimants who were awarded £300,000.


View full article here

Tags:

Comments

Phone tapping
[info]prestonian wrote:
Thursday, 9 July 2009 at 11:59 pm (UTC)
It is obvious that this is being done by the Guardian to damage Cameron via Coulson, partly in revenge for McBride and partly because it wants a scoop of its own to off-set the Telegraph's expenses revelations. Some of the people who are said to have had their calls listened are of no interest to anybody! Listening to Prescott, Brown and Charles Clarke in full-on sanctimonious hypocrisy was risible.
Re: Phone tapping
[info]stewartpa wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 06:01 am (UTC)
The fact that you do not seem to object to this illegal activity rather means that anything you say is of no value.
Re: Phone tapping
[info]sportingmac wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 07:53 am (UTC)
...it should be illegal to have to listen to half conversations on trains and other public places. I have listened to many MP's on the train and whilst they are of no interest to me the MP clearly has no regard for privacy either. So let's make it illegal to listen to mobile phone conversations in public too. :)
Well it stinks again
[info]robert_price wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 01:34 am (UTC)
It seems we live in a country where the police ignore crime in favour of stopping lawful protest. The met police have changed their boss from Tony Blair's namesake and best buddy to one which Boris might prefer in line with the likely general election result, and already this public servant is acting more like a seedy politician.

We ask what the police get out of a society in which crime is rampant and they betray their duty to the law and the public in favour of doing the government a favour? Then we remember that all the chief's of police got a massive extra wad of the countries cash this week, and realise just what a rotten country we live in.
To catch the conscience of the King.
[info]proximaking wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 07:11 am (UTC)
How many people believe that Murdoch didn't know? A fish rots from the head down and News International stinks to high heaven with him and his brood of halfwits running it. There is something rotten in the state of News International. Time he fell on his sword then hung himself out to dry just as he has done with so many others over the years. When will SKY news and all the other organs of the dirty diggers empire be told to turn their guns on him and his?

The play's the thing in which I'll catch the conscience of the King.

Wonder if prestonian would be quite as happy to have all of us listening into his "squidgy" moments as he seems to be happy to listen into ours? If they "are of no interest to anybody" no-one would have mentioned them as possibly being on the list of those spied on, or hasn't logic penetrated prestonian's head yet? If you remember there were several unexplained things about the squidgy tapes (Google it) that pointed to a conspiracy, was the dirty digger involved in that too? I think we should be told. I'd advise Brown to start the extradition formalities now because that Australian/Brit/American/"wherever I can make a buck" will be winging his way to spend time at her majesty's pleasure sooner rather than later, couldn't happen to a nicer guy.

[info]cm999 wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 07:22 am (UTC)
Well of course the police wont investigate, its too much like a real crime and they dont investigate them. THe police are only interested in revenue collection from hapless motorists. Investigating a real crime might require them to get out of their cars and office and deal with criminals and that would never do.
Why is this such a scandal?
[info]sportingmac wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 08:00 am (UTC)
We allow the Americans as well as UK security agencies to do it to everyone - all the time - in the interest of national security you understand!!

The difference is News International does it to only a few people but makes money from their sneaky activities. The security agencies do it to everyone.

If we hold an investigation into this then some High Court Judge will open up that can of worms and that won't do now will it.

Besides - it is crass stupidity, ignorance of basic personal security procedures that has been exploited here. Do yourselves a favour and set your password on your mailboxs now.
And our politicians wonder why he hold no respect for them
[info]deimosp wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 08:28 am (UTC)
No evidence, police tell him nobody hacked his phone yet Prescott still complains that Cameroon is at fault here !! Of course Labour are just trying to get back at the Conservatives after they found out what McBride had been doing and the following PR disaster. Unfortunately for them, McBride had done some pretty bad things, yet in this case the police have said insufficient evidence.

So why are our MPs wasting their Parliamentary time trying to score party political points over each other. After their expenses "issues" they were all saying they needed to get on with running teh country - and we now see them just trying to out PR each other in Parliament. It seems they have no interest in running the country (at a time it really needs some attention). And they wonder why the public have such a low opinion about them.

After their expenses were revealed I would have hoped it was time for them to get their heads down and get on with some real work rather than squabbling (paid for by us again).
Lots of other bugging methods too.......
[info]rhysjaggar wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 11:04 am (UTC)
1. Email hacking - it's ubiquitous. My email routing is also manipulated for mind games. I'd be delighted to learn more about how it's done. Perhaps Mr Coulson can tell us all?
2. Internet transactions - how did FORMER employers know within 1 hour of me booking a hotel I wonder? Trusties for an NOTW spying operation? Or was it the local Bill??
3. Trains - sometimes I appreciate people carrying out pseudo job chats on trains - especially when my email applications are all spiked. Just wonder who sets it up and whether its NOTW who spike the electronic ones, eh? Answers please, Mr Coulson??
4. Chip and Pin - you can be tracked as you return home etc. Don't use plastic and don't carry passports or licenses if you wish to be undisturbed.
5. Mobile tracking - you're monitored if you carry a mobile if people want to monitor you. Tabloids will. And coppers might sell that information, mightn't they?
6. If you're really annoying, important etc: Mr Murdoch's satellites. And if they are too low quality, I'm sure he can buy time from the CIA or the US military. He can watch you getting an erection with that kind of kit. Unless you limit sex sessions to metal-encased tombs or deep, deep geological orifices.....
7. Fylingdales: they'll use electronic wizardry to follow you at will. Expense? Not a problem if you're a menace......
8. Oh, and then there's the modern: 'walls are ears' truism. Go ask construction companies what gets put in walls nowadays. And what you can detect in the flat one floor up if you're the proud possessor of some gimmickry. Does make a case to build your own home out in the country, doesn't it?

Question is: where does all that info go and who do they sell it to?

Answer: to our security sections (a bit), but more to Russia, China, France, the US and the Arabs. And, of course, to the media, who buy it.

Oh: and to a few billionaires. Amazing what money can buy you, isn't it?

It can buy 24/7 monitoring of my PC keystrokes. Why UK Billionaires would be interested in that I don't know. But freeing myself from their tentacles is an ongoing 'interest and concern'..........
Why the police won't investigate?
[info]jack_dawes wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 11:17 am (UTC)
It is well known that certain members of the police forces in this country sell information to journalists who are willing to pay for it and that this practice can be a lucrative little earner. Could it be that the lack of enthusiasm for investigating this whole issue results from a fear of exposing doubtful ethics and possible corruption within the police's own ranks?
Mr Prescott called for the sacking of Andy Coulson
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 03:48 pm (UTC)
Quick off the mark mate! He resigned a couple of years back so he can't be fired. I guess its like us saying Tony Blair should be fired!