The accountants Grant Thornton are believed to have contacted clients offering ways of cutting employees' tax contributions by as much as 40 per cent. There are other accountancy firms offering similar services and the fact that the service is being touted in a year that will see some bankers receive huge payments after a busy few months in the City is likely to cause consternation at the Treasury.
It comes in the week that Alistair Darling will publish his White Paper on banking reform, much of which is expected to concentrate on the way bankers' bonuses are paid.
The Chancellor said in an interview with The Independent last week that many bankers needed to be "brought back down to Earth". He followed that comment over the weekend by saying that "we need to learn lessons from the financial crisis in which banks behaved in a kamikaze manner and the regulatory system failed.
"Far too many people in boardrooms did not know, nor understand what was happening in their institutions."
The remarks come ahead of Wednesday's White Paper when the Government is likely to call for greater curbs on excessive City pay, and adopt the recommendations of Lord Turner, the chairman of the Financial Services Authority (FSA), who has said that banks' pay policy should be subject to regulatory risk assessments.
There has been disquiet in the City, and many think that the Government is now attacking the banking industry for political capital. Many believe the process started with the introduction of the 50p upper rate of income tax to be paid on salaries in excess of £150,000 from next April.
Grant Thornton's proposals come as a number of banks and other City firms are preparing to return to paying huge bonuses on the back of a surge in business.
As corporate clients have sought to shore-up balance sheets in the wake of the recession, the banks have cashed in. Many are also trying to tie customers into paying more fees by agreeing to refinance debt or confirm credit lines on the condition that the banks act as advisers for any lucrative merger and acquisition deals that follow in the future.
Bankers are typically paid a basic salary and in the past earned huge amounts of money taking a cut from the fees the banks earn for advising on and underwriting new deals. Goldman Sachs, which has now repaid the money it borrowed under the US government Tarp support scheme for the American financial services industry, is reported to be prepared to set aside as much as $20bn to pay staff.
Sources close to Goldman yesterday suggested that reports of the scale of the US bank?s bonus pool may be exaggerated and it was unlikely to engage the use of accountancy firms to advise on tax-efficient ways of paying remuneration.
The Treasury said yesterday that along withHerMajesty?s Revenue and Customs(HMRC), it is cracking down on any tax avoidance schemes. Last week the Government published its banking Code of Conduct, with Stephen Timms, the Financial Secretary, warning it would not tolerate the emergence of tax avoidance schemes.
?While banks play a vital role in the UK and are important contributors of tax, it is clear that many continue to be involved in tax avoidance that goes well beyond reasonable tax planning. The code is part of the work to minimise tax avoidance and ensure that large businesses such as banks have a clear understanding of the behaviours the tax authorities expect from them,? he said.
?As part of the consultation we will be talking directly with banks to develop a shared understanding of the principles that underpin the code and, in particular, what it will mean in practice for banks. This is vital to ensuring that the code plays a part in changing the behaviour of banks and in turn minimising the loss to taxpayers through tax avoidance.?
Francesca Lagerberg, the head of tax at Grant Thornton, yesterday said she was unaware of the source of the 40 per cent saving claim and added that the firm was not seeking to engineer tax avoidance schemes. ?These proposals, from us and all the other accountancy firms, are not the aggressive schemes that were sometimes employed a few years ago. There is no tax structure in place that will help bankers avoid the top rate of the income tax and other charges,? she said.
?We are offering bespoke solutions to companies that want to incentivise employees. It often involves government-sponsored schemes such as salary sacrifice practices. The last thing our clients want to spark is an investigation by HMRC into clients? remuneration polices.?
A spokesman for BDO Stoy Hayward, another accountancy group, confirmed that the firm was also offering similar services to banks but also stressed that it was not trying to engineer tax avoidance schemes.
View full article here


Comments
"Alistair Darling will publish his White Paper," as mentioned in The News of the World already. This must tell the public something!
Trying to create public disconcern by unsubstantiated claims is foolish and will inevitably cause public concern.
Please publish facts, rather than propoganda which which will cause public distain.
Inshollah greed will be eroded and sharing will be the norm
I simply cannot understand why Inland Revenue's tax rules are always several years behind the thinking of the Tricky Dickies in high finance. Is it the quality of the staff the Revenue employ? Is there some secret understanding?
The Chancellor had better get this one sorted out because the public have had quite enough of financial shenanigans of late and with the threat of raising the basic rate for ordinary tax payers, I suspect this will ensure his loss of office more readily than had he been guilty of some expenses fraud.
Financial services, while always important, cannot sustaintain the economy. As a nation, we cannot live on "tick" for ever, which is what these people sold us through mortgages, loans and credit cards. We have to earn a proper living rather than going on a consumer binge using other people's money.
And tax avoidance schemes and tax havens need to be controlled and the worst excesses stamped out. If these greedy bankers don't want to live by this country's rules, then I'm sure they can find their way to Heathrow. And good riddance!
It's no political it's plain common sense, nobody deserves zillions in bonuses when they have completely messed up the whole world financial system and want to carry on as before as though nothing had happened.
Maybe this detached elite don't think they have any personal responsibly or need to account to anybody at all.
It's amazing :-)
Or, at least, New Labour's sufficiently bedazzled by them, and its leadership (and, it seems, many of its parliamentarians) share so much of the bankers' personal aspirations, that it's not going to significantly challenge them. Which of them was it who said that he was supremely relaxed about people becoming very rich?
And the mantra used to be that "Labour's the party of the working man". What's astonishing is that there are even now people in the country who seem to believe that ...
Tax avoidance is effectively condoned by governments, because it's simply minimising one's tax bill by legal means. There's an easy way for the powers that be to stop it - change the rules.
During the super tax years many successfully people went into exile. The economy, business, employees and the overall economy benefit from successfully high earners because that income is spent on goods and services.
The 50% tax has been levied to take the political sting away from the abolition of the 10% tax rate.
The politics of envy are shamefully and it's to this governments discredit that they have once again resorted to introducing discriminatory tax regimes and playing to the class war gallery.
defenestrate
The right time to append the dream is to learn something new. Here it is
PRONUNCIATION:
(dee-FEN-uh-strayt)
MEANING:
verb tr.: To throw someone or something out of a window.
ETYMOLOGY:
From Latin de- (out of) + fenestra (window).
NOTES:
There have been many defenestrations over the course of history, but the most famous, and the one that inspired the word defenestration, was the Defenestration of Prague on May 23, 1618 . Two imperial regents and their secretary were thrown out of a window of the Prague Castle in a fight over religion. The men landed on a dung heap and survived. The Defenestration of Prague was a prelude to the Thirty Years' War.
See a Lego sculpture of the Defenestration of Prague. Also, check out the defenestration of various articles of furniture in this unique San Francisco sculpture.
USAGE:
"When someone in a Joe Lansdale novel is defenestrated, you feel like shaking the glass shards out of your lap."
Jeff Salamon; The Further Adventures of Hap and Leonard; The Austin American-Statesman (Texas); Jul 4, 2009 .
A THOUGHT FOR TODAY:
Man's capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but man's inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary. -Reinhold Niebuhr, theologian (1892-1971)
Some smart a**** will say why all these when we can pay 50p and keep quite.
It is not avoidance it is not 50p it is not we cannot (at least I can) pay, it is not that we are fools , it is not that we need to borrow from Jack, give to Jill and Jill to Jack on odd days, It is not the houses are fallen and we are looking at the roofs. What is us?
Have you ever seen the price of the property and tax ever, in your life . ever seen these go down. NO? Yes you are right. The banks keep on charging us all they can. We keep the cash with them to avoid the thugs and pay them. We pay the ledger fees, bank charges opening charges, closing charges, we pay we pay till our children then pay. The 50 p is not the banks other branch that thrives and they live on. You trust the Sarkar and these we are a fool.
It is not 50% it is 50 p from millions
I thank you
Firoali A.Mulla
Toolan
I don't know the answer to this conundrum and I have yet to read of one short of a revolution.
But there are some very bright people who contribute to these columns and who may have the answer ... perhaps the article will encourage them to set out their ideas.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
Had HBOS been allowed to fail, investors would have got their fifty thousand back, and the idiots at the top would have got a trip to Job Centre Plus.
But Brown and Darling were too gutless to take them on.
The old, the young and the incapacitated could be paid a living wage out of the proceeds.
Why not?
To fiddle their ways around the tax system to avoid paying tax is immoral and we all know solicitors and accountants help the wealthy be seen as legally correct in what they do when in fact they are morally corrupt.
I am glad I have never worked in these industries which supports this greed and corruption.
All I can see is that there must be an underlying weakness in the integrity of their status and achievements for them to need preferential treatment over the normal worker all the time. I call this being spoon-fed with perks and privileges to maintain false one-upmanship.
we deserve all the crap we get from powerless puppet politicians for being so stupid as to think they are there to serve us and not the giant corporations in oil, drugs, arms and banking.
wake up people you only have to find out where these stupid politicians get jobs when they're finished, and a lot of them during they're 'service' to the people!