Armstrong later said it was the computer glitch that kept him from dealing with a much more serious problem: when the descent had begun, before they rolled so they were face up, the Apollo 11 astronauts had noticed they were passing landmarks four seconds early. After the lunar module rocked forward, to point the engine nozzle straight down to feather their descent, they should have been able to see their smooth, flat landing site in the Sea of Tranquillity below. But Armstrong recognised nothing when he looked out of his window; the autopilot had taken them four miles beyond their target. "We were landing just short of a large crater with very large rocks covering a high percentage of the surface," he recalled.
Ten minutes after beginning their descent from orbit, at an altitude of 500ft, Armstrong switched to manual control. His heart rate leapt from 77bpm to 156bpm as he set the engine to hover and sought a safe place to touch down. To his right, Aldrin called out their altitude, rate of descent and forward speed, his hand never far from the button that would explosively abort the landing. Then he added a number: "90 seconds" ? the time until their landing fuel ran out. Finally, among the rubble ejected from the crater by a meteor impact millions of years ago, the mission commander saw a gap. Tilting the lunar module, they drifted to port.
At Mission Control, Gene Kranz, the flight director, turned to Charlie Duke, the astronaut charged with communicating with the crew. "Better remind them there ain't no damn gas stations on the Moon," he said. Duke's warning was more concise: "30 seconds." Aldrin's tense voice crackled back: "Light's on," referring to the low fuel signal. "Thirty feet... Kicking up some dust... Faint shadow... Contact light." They were down, with just enough fuel left for 16 seconds of flight ? less than the time it took you to read this paragraph.
For a 10-year-old boy, nervously fidgeting around his living-room, confirmation came from Armstrong: "Houston, Tranquillity Base here. The Eagle has landed." It was 8.17pm GMT on 20 July 1969. I remember whooping and jumping on and off the sofa in a scene much like the one at Mission Control. The 12-minute descent had been an agony of suspense. There had been no pictures of the descent to watch, and between the distortion of the communications and the technical jargon, the astronaut's funny accents had conveyed no meaning.
I knew nothing then about how close my heroes had come to disaster. The computer alarm was later blamed on a radar dish which had been left switched on, overloading the tiny computer. (Your mobile phone is about a million times more powerful.) The navigational error was caused by "masscons" ? the Moon, like the Earth, is less than perfectly spherical, so its gravity fluctuates as you fly over it. Mass concentrations had pulled the Eagle into a slightly lower orbit, speeding it up, and it was already going at more than one mile a second.
What I did know about Apollo 11 was still pretty impressive for a 10-year-old. I knew, for example, that the 363ft Saturn V rocket was one foot shorter than the dome on St Paul's Cathedral. I knew the velocity required to escape the Earth's gravity (seven miles per second), the distance to the Moon (239,000 miles) and the time lag as radio signals travelled there and back (three seconds). Years before the word was invented, I was a geek ? a space geek. I knew that the age I was growing up in was neither Modern nor Atomic, nor Post-War. It was the Space Age, and the arrival of men on the Moon, even if they were, disappointingly, not British, was its defining moment. By the time I was an adult, I knew lunar trips would be as routine as taking a jumbo jet from London to New York.
So the past 40 years have been a bit of a letdown, a point I tactfully made to David Scott, commander of Apollo 15, when he visited London last month to open a new ride at the Science Museum. Where was Moon Base One, I demanded. Why couldn't I just buy a ticket on the internet for a discount break on a space station? "We made it look too easy," said Scott, the seventh of 12 men to walk on the Moon. "Put it in perspective," he said, comparing the Apollo missions to the gradual discovery of the Americas. "Columbus has just returned but Cabot and Magellan have not yet made their voyages. And Cook hasn't even been born." He's right about Captain James Cook, but John Cabot and Ferdinand Magellan both sailed within 40 years of Columbus.
I'm not about to argue. Aged 77, Scott is still a commanding figure, tall with a distinguished head of grey hair. He flew with Armstrong in Gemini 8 and was the command module pilot in Apollo 9. On his lapel he wears a gold astronaut's pin, a shooting star rising to orbit on three streaks. He must have heard the same questions 1,000 times, yet he answers patiently. Moon rocks feel as though they're made from Styrofoam, he tells one young lad. To me, he describes flying the lunar module as "like trying to run on an ice-covered pond and turn without skates. It's more difficult than any plane I ever flew," he says. "You 'zone' like an Olympic athlete. You're totally focused." Then the former test pilot thinks of a better metaphor: "It's like riding a pogo stick on a trampoline."
Our nearest neighbour was hurtling around Earth once every 27 days, seven hours and 43 minutes long before man evolved. It governs the tides, illuminates the night and provides a convenient measure of time between the day and the year. The Greeks believed in Hecate, a three-faced goddess who transformed into Artemis as the satellite waxed and then into Selene when it was full. Plutarch told of cave-dwelling Moon demons. Johannes Kepler wrote that its craters were built by Moon creatures. And as recently as the 1920s, the American astronomer William Pickering thought it might have insects. The superstitious believed sleeping in moonbeams would drive one crazy and werewolves transformed from men into monsters by its light. In A Midsummer Night's Dream, Shakespeare called the crescent moon "a silver bow new-bent in heaven"; Shelley described it in "The Cloud" as "that orbed maiden with white fire laden". So enamoured were poets and lyricists, particularly bad ones, that by the early 20th century, rhymes with "spoon" and "June" were the worst of clichés.
The first recorded story of a trip to the Moon was a satirical piece by the Syrian writer Lucian of Samosata during the 2nd century AD, who had his hero sucked up in a water spout. In the 1600s, Cyrano de Bergerac imagined being lifted to the Moon by bottles of dew. Two centuries later, Jules Verne fired his crew off from a huge cannon, while in 1901 HG Wells invented anti-gravity. And in 1950, Hergé, Tintin's author, launched the young reporter and Captain Haddock in a ship that looked suspiciously like a German V2 rocket. They were all wrong ? but Hergé came closest.
Wernher von Braun conducted his first rocket experiment in 1924 by attaching fireworks to his sister's red wagon and setting it off in a busy Berlin street. The police arrested him. By the time he reached university, his love of astronomy and things that go bang was firmly established. He joined the Verein für Raumschiffahrt, an amateur spaceflight society, and was writing his doctorate when the Nazis came to power in 1933.
Von Braun's connection with the Nazis is controversial. He built weapons for Hitler, notably the V2, joined the SS and employed slave labourers at his factories. (More people died building the V2s than were killed when they landed on London.) But he was also suspected of being a Communist and was arrested for defeatism. He was one of those obsessed people who believe their work is more important than anything around them. His comment when the first V2 exploded in London is revealing: "The rocket worked perfectly except for landing on the wrong planet."
At the end of the Second World War, Von Braun and his team arranged to be captured by the Americans and were sent to the US under Operation Paperclip. Eventually, he would build every major US rocket up to the Saturn V. But at first, Washington was uninterested. Then the Soviet space programme scored a series of triumphs: the first artificial satellite (1957), the first animal in space (1957), the first unmanned Moon mission (1959), the first man in space (1961) and the first woman (1963). The space race had begun, and America was losing.
It doesn't take a cynic to appreciate the significance of Cold War politics on the Apollo programme. The ascendancy of the free market is clear now, but in the 1960s, central planning still seemed viable. The space race looked like a reasonable way to determine which system, capitalist or Communist, was superior, though so many factors were involved, including blind luck, that it could have gone either way.
President Dwight Eisenhower had been caught napping by Sputnik, a fact John Kennedy used in his 1960 campaign. But once in power, Kennedy seemed distracted by the Communist threat. Influential advisers argued that the US should cede space to the Soviets and get on with earthly business. Many space scientists wanted to concentrate on unmanned exploration, which offered richer rewards at lower cost. Yet Kennedy's hand was forced by the April 1961 flight of Yuri Gagarin in Vostok 1 and the Bay of Pigs fiasco five days later. The president had promised an army of Cuban exiles air support for their invasion, but failed to deliver. Survivors bitterly denounced his treachery, and his standing with the American public hit a record low. Desperate for a distraction, he called on vice president Lyndon Johnson. "Do we have a chance of beating the Soviets by putting up a laboratory in space?" he asked. "Or by a trip around the Moon, or by a rocket to go to the Moon and back with a man?" The mission didn't matter; all that counted was beating the Russians. In a speech to Congress a month later, Kennedy announced: "This nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him back safely to the Earth." America was back in the running.
'Apollo 1' sat atop a Saturn 1B rocket at Cape Kennedy on 27 January 1967 while its three member-crew went through a tedious five-hour systems check. The atmosphere inside the command module was pressurised pure oxygen. Political pressure was also high; president Johnson wanted an Apollo success to boost his re-election chances. But the command module had been plagued by 20,000 failures, and condemned as "sloppy and unsafe" by a quality-control inspector. Early in the test, the astronauts complained of a sour odour, and static was breaking into their communications. At 6.31pm, something sparked. "I've got a fire in the cockpit," reported mission commander Gus Grissom. "Fire!" shouted Roger Chafee. Then came a garbled, "Get us out!" possibly from Ed White.
In the pure-oxygen atmosphere, almost everything was inflammable. Metal pipes bubbled and dripped, joints melted, cooling lines burst, spraying burning fluid like a blowtorch. The foam cushions on the floor burst into a wall of flame between the crew and the exit. The hatch took 90 seconds to open in ideal circumstances. The crew of Apollo 1 died in 8.5 seconds.
The fatal fire could have brought the programme to a halt, or slowed it so much that the Soviets won. For the first time, public debate turned to whether the huge sums ($25bn in 1965 dollars, about £100bn today) being spent on a Moon shot were worthwhile. An internal investigation was never able to find the point of ignition, listing 10 possible sources. Poor management, carelessness, negligence and failure to consider safety were highlighted. Management at Nasa and the command-module contractor, North American, now part of Boeing, were overhauled. Half-a-billion dollars was spent on redesigning Apollo. Chris Kraft, one of the flight directors, said later: "It was unforgiveable that we allowed that accident to happen. [But] had it not happened, we probably would not have got to the Moon when we did."
The Russians had not been idle meanwhile, but they had been unlucky. Their first plan was to launch a "direct ascent" mission, with a single vehicle going all the way to the Moon and back. But their massive N-1 rocket was delayed. Under a second plan, "Earth orbit rendezvous", several smaller rockets would dock in orbit, then head to the Moon. But the first ship in the flotilla, Soyuz 1, crashed, killing cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov. A compromise mission, Zond, was devised to send a reduced crew to orbit the Moon and return without landing. Moscow dithered, however, and Nasa swapped its mission plans for Apollos 8 and 9, getting a crew into lunar orbit first. In 1968, Americans were treated to a Christmas Eve broadcast from the Moon. Mission commander Frank Borman looked back at the Earth, calling it "a grand oasis in the vastness of space".
Nasa's plan was to employ a technique known as "lunar orbit rendezvous", in which a two-part lunar module goes to the surface, and the top section blasts off to rejoin the orbiting command module, transferring the astronauts and samples. The command module then heads for Earth. After Apollo 9 practised docking manoeuvres between lander and command module above the Earth, Apollo 10 returned to the Moon, dropping its lander to within nine miles of the surface. (That command module is in the Science Museum in London.)
In February 1969, the Soviet N-1 rocket was at last ready, but it exploded on its first unmanned flight. The Russians were all but beaten. They made one last attempt ? a smaller, unmanned mission that would return rock samples to Earth ? but it, too, crashed. Only the Americans were left in the race.
Half-a-million people crowded the roads and waterways around Cape Kennedy to watch the launch on 16 July of Apollo 11 and an estimated half-a-billion saw it on television. "It was awe-inspiring," recalls Dr Allan Needell, curator of the space-history division at the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum in Washington. "There was a lot of tension in the US over civil rights and the war in Vietnam back then. Apollo 11 overcame some of that strife and conflict. There was a great sense of human accomplishment." Even a small band of protesters who felt Nasa's money could be better spent reducing poverty ended up appreciating Nasa's point of view after being given ringside seats to the launch of Armstrong, Aldrin and the command-module pilot, Michael Collins.
Neil Armstrong never quite matched the image of the first man to walk on the Moon. "How long must it take," he demanded in 1976, "before I cease to be known as a spaceman?" Unlike many other astronauts, he never jumped on Nasa's publicity bandwagon. "He was a bit of a recluse even before the mission," says Dr Needell. "He's a respected member of the astronaut corps, very knowledgeable. But he has never readily accepted the role of public icon."
If Armstrong were to be remembered for anything else, it would be as an aeronautical engineer. The son of a state civil servant posted to Wapakoneta, Ohio, he enrolled in the Navy to fund his education at Purdue University. His experience as a pilot in the Korean War helped further his understanding of aircraft, but only after he graduated did he think of becoming a test pilot, and from there of joining the astronaut programme.
Nasa is said to have been divided about whether Armstrong or Aldrin should be the first to set foot on the Moon. In the end, the mission commander got the honour... then flubbed his lines. He intended to say, "One small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind," but left out the definite article, turning it into a tautology. Aldrin's most memorable quote came shortly after he joined Armstrong on the surface: "Magnificent desolation."
For the two spacemen, the point of the mission was to get to the Moon and return safely. Science was not their top priority, nor was putting up flags or taking pictures. But they did collect samples, and more were added on the five subsequent missions. In all, some 382kg of Moon rocks were returned to Earth. Two fragments are housed in the Natural History Museum in London: a blackened chunk of anorthosite breccia, a calcium-rich feldspar, brought back by Apollo 16, and a volcanic basalt gathered by the Apollo 17 astronauts.
What started out as a political, Cold War race ended up adding substantially to human knowledge, says Tom Watters, senior scientist at the Center for Earth and Planetary Studies at the National Air and Space Museum. Before Apollo, the Moon was thought to have originated either as a passing planetoid captured by Earth's gravity or by condensing out of the same primordial dust cloud as the Earth. Thanks to evidence including the Apollo rocks, the consensus today is that a Mars-size planet slammed into the early Earth, throwing up a cloud of debris that coalesced into the Moon.
A new space race is shaping up, though the competition will be far less intense than it was 40 years ago. The US plans a return to the Moon, while China, India and Japan are each preparing for manned missions. If they succeed, they will add substantially to our knowledge. Dr Watters is hopeful, for example, that additional seismometers will help locate the sources of the small quakes detected by instruments left by the Apollo missions. It is not yet clear whether these are from unseen impacts or tectonic processes. And little is known about the far side of the Moon.
For the 10-year-old space geek in me, this flurry of activity also holds out hope. One day, probably too late for me admittedly, someone will build a permanent Moon Base One. And then the Space Age will really start to reach for the stars.
Buzz Aldrin's memoir 'Magnificent Desolation' (Bloomsbury, £16.99) is out now. The British Film Institute (www.bfi.org.uk) and Science Museum (www.sciencemuseum.org.uk) are holding One Giant Leap, a series of feature films, documentaries and artworks this month, including the exhibition Gravity Sucks
View full article here


Comments
Forget about green projects to create more and new jobs - think space.
According to current estimates another mission to Moon or whatever planet will cosy over trillions of zillions of dollars;
http://seds.org/archive/spaceviews/9
No wonder that some still think nobody had ever landed on Moon.
According to current estimates another mission to Moon or whatever planet will cosy over trillions of zillions of dollars;
http://seds.org/archive/spaceviews/9
No wonder that some still think nobody had ever landed on Moon.
I am one of them, who belive that nobody had ever landed on Moon! The pictures Nasa presented were made on the Earth and it could be easily proven by the shadows!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMINSD7M
http://krishna.org/did-man-really-w
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/masona
http://www.starpulse.com/forum/index.ph
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToH5Ocwi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nn6WZf_e
Someone who doesn't believe in the moon landings, quoting an article on bibbleBelievers.org.au as proof of this. Now thats what you call irony.
FFS there a recording of Lovell, on this site, of him tracking the whole event. I suppose he was in on it as well, along with ever other person who could operate a radio telescope at the time.
You are a Prized Fool.
A simple way to prove that they landed on the moon is to train e.g. Hubble on to the moon and look at the items they left behind. E.g. the flag, the lunar buggies or the lunar module base unit. Admittedly they could have just dropped this stuff from the mother ship onto the moon surface without stepping foot on the moon but if it is there then that would add real credibility to there having been a real lunar landing. You can mock all you like but 'literally' point to the evidence on the lunar surface!
I also suspect that the Americans are getting hot under the collar now because if the lunar flight does go ahead by the Chinese or Japanese that was talked about a year or so ago, then if no evidence is found when they get there then how will the yanks explain that away. We'll probably get some nonsense about solar winds blowing it all away etc.
Just point to evidence - if it is there then surely that's proof.
Is the recording fake? Was he in on it? Did the american's somehow fool him and fake the radio signal comming form the moon.
Another big elephant in the room for ya, why oh why would the russians not expose this so called fake. Perhaps America's greatest propaganda triumph of the cold war, but no, the rusians say nothing, but of course they were in on it to.
Look at it another way, for the landings to be faked, look at everything that has to come together for the lie to be maintained. Thousands of people and multiple countries either participating in the lie or being fooled by it. I haven't heard one account of someone involved in the space program comming foward saying it was faked.
Now what evidence do have for the landings.
Rocket takes off.
Signal's comming from orbiter around the moon.(Independently verified by Lovell)
Video of Lem descending from the moon. (Show me any film from that era that comes close to matching that if it was faked)
100's of kilo's of moon rock.
It could be hard to accept that chickens lay eggs, not because the exit is too tiny, but because we have never seen a chicken (laying egg).
No-one landed on the moon back then, not using those landers in any case. Maybe they could have landed since then of course but when we go back check every picture of the sites very carefully and there is no way the pictures will be the same even if "the original landers" are now sitting there.
This has been in the public domain for over six years now, even you could build one to go to the moon and fake a landing. Rubbish??
http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2008/01/0
Even a ten year old geek could build one, it's all in the lossy wheels within wheels of the mouse motor mounting and the blue light flashing on shiny washers, ........ apparently.
And it might just explain this too. http://hackedgadgets.com/2007/02/02/h
Now if all this is sounding a bit messianic, after all wheels within wheels and nails and candles have quite religious connotations think again. What better way to show ideas are correct than to plant them in the most widely owned book of all time, impossible in a mass based universe of course but entirely possible in this one. Dominion means a duty to care for not a right to dominate.
More fun thinking about these sorts of ideas than continuing to publish lies about moon landings that never were.
I suppose you all think your sky god handles the telecommunications networks around the world.
Saddoes.
There are two manned flight goals for NASA, one is getting into orbit, the other is leaving earths orbit and going beyond - like the moon.
Everyone accepts that man has been into space(around 130 miles above) ie, into orbit around the earth.
The debate is about whether man has gone outside the earth's orbit. Specifically the Apollo claims from the late 1960's to have landed man on the moon.
As we're able to measure the change in the Moon's orbit as it recedes from the Earth at a rate of a few cms per year due to instrumentation left on its surface after one of the Moon landings (can't remember which but it may have been the first), I'm pretty confident we landed there!
Consider this. Apart from the Apollo missions no one ever went to the Moon. Space stations are operated in low orbit below the worst of the Van Allen belts. Space radiation and lunar radiation are still considered a major hazard and obstacle to manned flights per NASA themselves. Long term human habitation of the Moon or even Mars is with our much later technology still not feasible.
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Manned-M
According to ex-NASA space radiation program scientist and committee member at the National Research Council, Walter Schimmerling, there are still many uncertainties regarding the actual risk posed by space radiation to living beings. This means that safety margins are not yet well defined and still remain high, in order to compensate. This ultimately limits the astronauts' stay in space, ruling out for now any possible long-term missions to bodies in the solar system, other than Earth.
As NASA also said they were a bit lucky with Apollo and basically they were not exposed long term.
Hm, perhaps.
Radioactive Moon
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y
The surface of the Moon is baldly exposed to cosmic rays and solar flares, and some of that radiation is very hard to stop with shielding. Furthermore, when cosmic rays hit the ground, they produce a dangerous spray of secondary particles right at your feet. All this radiation penetrating human flesh can damage DNA, boosting the risk of cancer and other maladies.
For people to live and work on the Moon safely, the radiation problem must be solved.
It appears the Moon is a source of dangerous radiation but in 1969 and later landings they were in the dark so shielded from some and were lucky again.
All possible I suppose but why have we not been back since?
http://www.space.com/businesstechno
"A lot of people think about the Apollo astronauts, and that they didn't have much protection and were fine," Lane told SPACE.com. "But in Apollo, it was a very short mission and a lot of it was basically luck. I'm not sure how they managed to be so lucky, but I don't think you can count on luck on short missions for the future or trips to the planets."
There you have it. They were very lucky. Or just maybe they did film the human bits on earth.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/0
I've checked and you're quite right about the 1961 Gallup poll. It actually gave him an 82% approval rating. My information came from a historian at the Smithsonian, usually a reliable source. Thanks for setting the record straight.
paul
Q. how many inches thick was the Eagle's lead shield?
The radiation dose received by the Apollo astronauts was less than the then accepted safe level for workers at nuclear reactors in the US (I'm not sure how it compares to today's standards but I'm sure you can find out). The recorded surface doses were between 0.16 and 1.14 rads, well below the 400rads set as the maximum operational dose.
The main threat to the astronauts was the possibility of a solar flare. As you imply, the Eagle was a thin, fragile craft, but Columbia was much more robust as it had to withstand atmospheric re-entry. Fortunately, only one small flare was recorded, during Apollo 12, and it did not significantly increase the dosage received by the astronauts.
A more detailed account can be found at: http://lsda.jsc.nasa.gov/books/apollo/S
paul
Meanwhile, I remain in stunned disbelief at the number of people who don't believe the Moon landings ever happened, and the intensity of their emotion in saying so. It happened.
Standy by, my friend. NASA launched last month the Lunar Reconnaisance Orbiter, which is now circling the Moon and slowly settling into its operational orbit. Once there, its high resolution camera should be able to pick out the LM descent stages of the six landing sites, and likely the rover tracks from Apollo's 15, 16 and 17.
Meanwhile, scientists for years have been pointing a laser at the Moon to measure the distance between us and there. The laser reflects off of an instrument some of the crews left on the Moon, including Neil and Buzz on Apollo 11.
As for the flag fluttering in the wind, when the Apollo 11 crew set the flag up, they couldn't get the rod going through the top of the flag to fully extend, so that left the flag with a wrinkled appearance that in images makes it look like it is fluttering in the breeze. But even the best telescope or camera won't pick out the Apollo 11 flag still "fluttering in the breeze." The flag fell over when the Eagle ascent stage lifted off, and it has long since been bleached white by the sun's UV light and possibly "decomposed."
See this story for more on the flag and a good overview of lunar surface photography from orbit, plus a preview of the LRO activity:
http://www.airspacemag.com/space-explor
I know you're probably still not convinced, and you'll claim that the LRO images still to come will be Photoshopped. But that's OK. Perhaps you will be inspired to support a commercial space effort to go up to the Moon and independently prove we did go there.
Keep asking the questions, though. It proves we all share the desire to explore what we don't know.
Glad you liked the story. I was aware of the research you cite but decided that if the "a" was too short to hear then it counted as fluffing his lines. Intention without enunciation is not communication.
paul
Men landed on moon. Not just once, but 6 times.
Those of you cannot or will not understand how this is possible should not have been sleeping in your science classes. It is said that there are 2 kinds of people in this world: (I know I hate these too, but this one has held true without fail) Those who understand the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics and those who don't.
Something else to think about, if we (yes I'm a Yank) had not landed men on the moon, the Russians (along with the rest of the world not stuck in the 19th century) would have then and continued to do so to this day, shouted it from the rooftops.
You people remind me of the very type who complain about government programs being wastes of taxpayers money... while saying so on a medium created by... government programs, now better known as the Internet.
So before you post any sad and uninformed replies, you really should contemplate how your ignorance is going to bring about WW3. (But I'll bet you slept through your history classes as well)
God help us all.
Dont be too stunned. We are even more stunned at the ignorance of the population (of the worlds number one superpower) - your country.
I wonder how Americans know any country names beginning with "U"? or
the number of sides on a triangle? or
the religion of Israel? or
the currency used in the UK ? or
one of many general knowledge questions about the rest of the world.
Its quite scary the answers the American public gave!
Please understand that I was not picking on any country in particular, but if I were to do so, it would be my own. To have the very people of the only nation to have put men on the moon think it was faked, is beyond belief.
I dont think anyone is saying that the moon landings were faked to fool the American public, it was a cold and a space race. The whole nuclear weapons affair was (and is) based on show of capability and therefore the deterrant value of these capabilities.
For the USA to "illustrate" that it won the space race, to the moon, was a strategic victory. But later on, the closer examination of the video, pictures and surrounding events shows flaws in the "illusion", even though they had a 4 billion dollars budget to play with.
FOR THE FUTURE OF HUMANITY, CITADEL TO CAPTURE IS OTHER PLANETS , EARTH'S NATURAL SATELLITE NOT FLOATING IN WEIGHTLESSNESS .
I just found this video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdaBwh2
tecnology NASA used on the moon landing. And I thought that would be
interesting. It's a new tv show for celebrating the 40th anniversary of moon
landing.
for you.
Hope you enjoy!
Best regards,
FPM
Ever wonder why you lot never get taken seriously in the news articles??
But still I'd like to thank the tax payers who helped pay for my humble abode and long may the powers that be have total thought control on the masses. Be it flat earth, evolution theories; 200,000 mile trips to a rock in outerspace or public expenses in general.
So as a troll (proud and happy to defend my minority troll-like ways) I question though why some of the believers (the masses) can only resort to calling the minority that question with words like "saddoes", "tw*ts", "thick", "loosers", "fools" etc.
Maybe to understand these particular believers and their "well-structured arguments" one has to understand their mindset and start watching soap operas and reality TV too. Whoooooooooooosh!