Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry


Unsolicited credit card cheques to be banned

Posted by The Independent
  • Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 09:18 am
Author: By Nicky Burridge, Press Association

The move will be outlined in its Consumer White Paper, which is also expected to contain measures to promote responsible lending and strengthen the rights of consumers.

The Government has been critical of credit card cheques, warning earlier this week that they could draw people further into debt than they intended to go.

Credit card cheques can be used like personal cheques, with the value of the transaction added to the borrower's card balance.

But the interest charged on the cheques is usually far higher than if a credit card had been used to make the same purchase, while handling fees often of 2 per cent of the value of the transaction are also charged, and there is no interest free period.

The Office of Fair Trading estimated in 2006 that people could be paying up to £57 million a year extra in interest and charges by using the cheques, compared with if they had used their credit card.

Consumer Affairs Minister Kevin Brennan will be launching the White Paper at an event in London hosted by consumer group Consumer Focus.


View full article here

Tags:

Comments

Credit card cheques
[info]angryman9 wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 09:18 am (UTC)
What a load of rubbish, credit card cheques, if used properly can save the customer a great deal of money, if you keep up with your monthly payments they are far cheaper than using the card.
Re: Credit card cheques
[info]claudiusgoth wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 10:06 am (UTC)
exactly, check the details and they can work very well
Re: Credit card cheques
[info]theelectrician wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 10:39 am (UTC)
"...But the interest charged on the cheques is usually far higher than if a credit card had been used to make the same purchase, while handling fees often of 2 per cent of the value of the transaction are also charged, and there is no interest free period. .."

That extract from the article seems to be in opposition to what you claim in your comment. Can you say why this is?
Wow. Labour does something good for a change.
[info]colin_brown wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 09:23 am (UTC)
There must be a general election looming.